Technical Report 10 (translated)

Picture No. 3.22Area of drainage Not 5 (Centennial)STATE (8) SOCIAL (9) TOTALCONEX. lts/día m3/año m3/s(1) (2) (3) (4) CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM (10) (11) (12) (13)2005 - 2006 306.035 66,05% 202.140 28.968 11.805 987 426 115 53 344 161 71 523 43.452 65.810.318 24.020.766 0.762006 - 2007 307.599 67,00% 206.091 29.534 12.036 1.006 434 118 54 350 164 72 533 44.302 66.901.769 24.419.146 0.772007 - 2008 309.171 68,00% 210.236 30.128 12.278 1.026 443 120 55 357 167 74 544 45.193 68.046.821 24.837.090 0.792008 - 2009 310.751 69,00% 214.418 30.728 12.522 1.047 452 123 56 365 170 75 554 46.092 69.203.268 25.259.193 0.802009 - 2010 312.339 70,00% 218.637 31.332 12.769 1.067 461 125 57 372 174 77 565 46.999 70.365.095 25.683.260 0.812010 - 2011 313.935 71,00% 222.894 31.942 13.017 1.088 470 127 58 379 177 78 576 47.914 71.543.802 26.113.488 0.832011 - 2012 315.539 72,00% 227.188 32.558 13.268 1.109 479 130 60 386 181 80 587 48.837 72.732.009 26.547.183 0.842012 - 2013 317.151 73,00% 231.520 33.179 13.521 1.130 488 132 61 394 184 81 599 49.768 73.926.308 26.983.102 0.862013 - 2014 318.772 74,00% 235.891 33.805 13.776 1.152 497 135 62 401 187 83 610 50.708 75.133.329 27.423.665 0.872014 - 2015 320.401 75,00% 240.301 34.437 14.034 1.173 507 137 63 409 191 84 621 51.656 76.353.786 27.869.132 0.882015 - 2016 322.038 76,00% 244.749 35.074 14.294 1.195 516 140 64 416 195 86 633 52.612 77.582.648 28.317.666 0.902016 - 2017 323.684 77,00% 249.237 35.717 14.556 1.217 526 142 65 424 198 87 644 53.576 78.819.165 28.768.995 0.912017 - 2018 325.338 78,00% 253.764 36.366 14.820 1.239 535 145 66 431 202 89 656 54.550 80.068.088 29.224.852 0.932018 - 2019 327.001 79,00% 258.331 37.021 15.087 1.261 545 148 68 439 205 90 668 55.531 81.332.121 29.686.224 0.942019 - 2020 328.672 80,00% 262.938 37.681 15.356 1.284 554 150 69 447 209 92 680 56.522 82.606.080 30.151.219 0.962020 - 2021 330.352 81,00% 267.585 38.347 15.627 1.306 564 153 70 455 213 94 692 57.521 83.889.532 30.619.679 0.972021 - 2022 332.040 82,00% 272.273 39.019 15.901 1.329 574 156 71 463 216 95 704 58.528 85.184.748 31.092.433 0.992022 - 2023 333.737 83,00% 277.002 39.696 16.177 1.352 584 158 73 471 220 97 716 59.545 86.491.460 31.569.383 1.002023 - 2024 335.442 84,00% 281.771 40.380 16.456 1.375 594 161 74 479 224 98 729 60.570 87.804.286 32.048.564 1.022024 - 2025 337.156 85,00% 286.583 41.070 16.737 1.399 604 164 75 487 228 100 741 61.604 89.135.472 32.534.447 1.032025 - 2026 338.879 86,00% 291.436 41.765 17.020 1.423 615 167 76 495 232 102 754 62.648 90.477.104 33.024.143 1.05Note:(4) = (2) x (3)(10) = (4)/density by lot(12) = (11)/1000*365YEAR POPULATIONTOTALCOVER(%)POPULATIONSERVEDC/CONEXION (hab)I NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS OF GREAT VOLUME AVERAGE OF DESAGUEDOMESTIC (5) COMMERCIAL (6) INDUSTRIALIST (7)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO118Picture No. 3.23Area of drainage Not 6 (Collector Not 6)DECENTRALIZED PLANTS (2015)STATE (8) SOCIAL (9) TOTALCONEX. lts/día m3/año m3/s Qp(m3/s)Qp(l/dia)Qp(m3/año)(1) (2) (3) (4) CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM (10) (11) (12) (13) 1,07 92.448.000 33,743,5202005 - 2006 1.293.212 60,40% 781.087 121.700 36.788 2.460 747 450 124 667 109 473 1.200 164.717 234.284.488 85.513.838 2.712006 - 2007 1.325.954 67,00% 888.389 138.418 41.842 2.797 850 512 141 758 124 538 1.365 187.345 265.060.532 96.747.094 3.072007 - 2008 1.359.525 68,00% 924.477 144.041 43.542 2.911 884 533 147 789 129 559 1.421 194.955 275.408.429 100.524.077 3.192008 - 2009 1.393.946 69,00% 961.823 149.860 45.301 3.028 920 554 153 821 134 582 1.478 202.831 286.121.397 104.434.310 3.312009 - 2010 1.429.239 70,00% 1.000.467 155.881 47.121 3.150 957 577 159 854 140 606 1.537 210.980 297.204.884 108.479.783 3.442010 - 2011 1.465.425 71,00% 1.040.452 162.111 49.004 3.276 995 600 165 888 145 630 1.599 219.413 308.673.675 112.665.891 3.572011 - 2012 1.502.527 72,00% 1.081.819 168.556 50.952 3.406 1.035 623 172 923 151 655 1.662 228.136 320.533.937 116.994.887 3.712012 - 2013 1.540.569 73,00% 1.124.615 175.224 52.968 3.541 1.075 648 179 960 157 681 1.728 237.161 332.807.499 121.474.737 3.852013 - 2014 1.579.574 74,00% 1.168.885 182.122 55.053 3.681 1.118 674 186 998 163 708 1.796 246.497 345.512.237 126.111.967 4.002014 - 2015 1.619.567 75,00% 1.214.675 189.256 57.210 3.825 1.162 700 193 1.037 170 735 1.866 256.153 358.638.137 130.902.920 4.152015 - 2016 1.660.572 76,00% 1.262.035 196.636 59.440 3.974 1.207 727 200 1.077 176 764 1.939 266.140 279.776.359 102.118.371 3.242016 - 2017 1.702.615 77,00% 1.311.014 204.267 61.747 4.128 1.254 755 208 1.119 183 794 2.014 276.469 293.823.692 107.245.648 3.402017 - 2018 1.745.723 78,00% 1.361.664 212.159 64.133 4.287 1.302 785 216 1.162 190 824 2.092 287.150 308.347.510 112.546.841 3.572018 - 2019 1.789.922 79,00% 1.414.038 220.319 66.599 4.452 1.352 815 224 1.207 197 856 2.173 298.195 323.370.736 118.030.319 3.742019 - 2020 1.835.240 80,00% 1.468.192 228.756 69.150 4.623 1.404 846 233 1.253 205 889 2.256 309.615 338.904.097 123.699.996 3.922020 - 2021 1.881.706 81,00% 1.524.182 237.480 71.787 4.799 1.458 878 242 1.301 213 923 2.342 321.422 354.963.987 129.561.855 4.112021 - 2022 1.929.348 82,00% 1.582.065 246.499 74.513 4.981 1.513 912 251 1.350 221 958 2.431 333.629 371.560.027 135.619.410 4.302022 - 2023 1.978.196 83,00% 1.641.903 255.822 77.331 5.170 1.570 946 261 1.402 229 994 2.523 346.248 388.724.261 141.884.355 4.502023 - 2024 2.028.281 84,00% 1.703.756 265.459 80.245 5.365 1.629 982 270 1.454 238 1.031 2.618 359.291 406.466.078 148.360.119 4.702024 - 2025 2.079.634 85,00% 1.767.689 275.421 83.256 5.566 1.690 1.019 281 1.509 247 1.070 2.716 372.774 424.799.896 155.051.962 4.922025 - 2026 2.132.287 86,00% 1.833.767 285.716 86.368 5.774 1.754 1.057 291 1.565 256 1.110 2.818 386.708 443.752.188 161.969.548 5.14Note: As of year 2015 the decentralized plants are gotten up, that are anticipated will treat a Qp = 1.07 m3/s (Source: Equipment Investigation, Normalization and Physical Planning - SEDAPAL)(4) = (2) x (3)(10) = (4)/density by lot(12) = (11)/1000*365YEAR POPULATIONTOTALCOBERTURA (%)POPULATIONSERVEDC/CONEXION(hab)I NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS OF GREAT VOLUME AVERAGE OF DESAGUEDOMESTIC (5) COMMERCIAL (6) INDUSTRIALIST (7)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO119Picture No. 3.24Area of drainage Not 7 (Bocanegra)STATE (8) SOCIAL (9) TOTALCONEX. lts/día m3/año m3/s(1) (2) (3) (4) CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM (10) (11) (12) (13)2005 - 2006 162.426 60,01% 97.475 14.881 4.959 347 198 66 33 97 40 32 411 21.066 22.982.812 8.388.727 0.272006 - 2007 165.946 67,00% 111.184 16.974 5.657 396 226 76 38 110 46 37 469 24.029 25.822.020 9.425.037 0.302007 - 2008 169.543 68,00% 115.289 17.601 5.866 411 235 78 39 115 48 38 486 24.916 26.668.490 9.733.999 0.312008 - 2009 173.218 69,00% 119.520 18.247 6.081 426 243 81 41 119 49 39 504 25.831 27.544.872 10.053.878 0.322009 - 2010 176.973 70,00% 123.881 18.913 6.303 441 252 85 42 123 51 41 522 26.773 28.445.572 10.382.634 0.332010 -2011 180.809 71,00% 128.374 19.599 6.531 457 262 88 44 128 53 42 541 27.744 29.377.247 10.722.695 0.342011 - 2012 184.728 72,00% 133.004 20.306 6.767 474 271 91 46 132 55 44 561 28.745 30.330.956 11.070.799 0.352012 - 2013 188.732 73,00% 137.774 21.034 7.010 491 281 94 47 137 57 45 581 29.776 31.319.962 11.431.786 0.362013 - 2014 192.823 74,00% 142.689 21.784 7.260 508 290 97 49 142 59 47 602 30.838 32.336.650 11.802.877 0.372014 - 2015 197.002 75,00% 147.752 22.557 7.517 526 301 101 51 147 61 49 623 31.932 33.385.236 12.185.611 0.392015 - 2016 201.272 76,00% 152.967 23.353 7.783 545 311 104 52 152 63 50 645 33.059 34.461.925 12.578.603 0.402016 - 2017 205.635 77,00% 158.339 24.173 8.056 564 322 108 54 157 65 52 668 34.220 35.571.586 12.983.629 0.412017 - 2018 210.092 78,00% 163.872 25.018 8.338 584 334 112 56 163 68 54 691 35.416 36.714.072 13.400.636 0.422018 - 2019 214.646 79,00% 169.570 25.888 8.627 604 345 116 58 168 70 56 715 36.648 37.892.629 13.830.810 0.442019 - 2020 219.298 80,00% 175.438 26.784 8.926 625 357 120 60 174 73 58 740 37.916 39.110.034 14.275.162 0.452020 - 2021 224.051 81,00% 181.481 27.706 9.234 647 370 124 62 180 75 60 765 39.222 40.357.706 14.730.563 0.472021 - 2022 228.907 82,00% 187.704 28.657 9.550 669 382 128 64 186 78 62 791 40.567 41.644.375 15.200.197 0.482022 - 2023 233.869 83,00% 194.111 29.635 9.876 692 395 132 66 193 80 64 818 41.951 42.968.499 15.683.502 0.502023 - 2024 238.938 84,00% 200.708 30.642 10.212 715 409 137 69 199 83 66 846 43.377 44.334.929 16.182.249 0.512024 - 2025 244.117 85,00% 207.499 31.679 10.557 739 423 141 71 206 86 68 875 44.845 45.736.491 16.693.819 0.532025 - 2026 249.408 86,00% 214.491 32.746 10.913 764 437 146 73 213 89 70 904 46.356 47.183.343 17.221.920 0.55Note:(4) = (2) x (3)(10) = (4)/density by lot(12) = (11)/1000*365YEAR POPULATIONTOTALCOVER(%)POPULATIONSERVEDC/CONEXION (hab)I NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS OF GREAT VOLUME AVERAGE OF DESAGUEDOMESTIC (5) COMMERCIAL (6) INDUSTRIALIST (7)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO120Picture No. 3.25Area of drainage Not 8 (Commas - Chillón)STATE (8) SOCIAL (9) TOTALCONEX. lts/día m3/año m3/s(1) (2) (3) (4) CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM CM SM (10) (11) (12) (13)2005 - 2006 1.497.194 59,34% 888.445 107.148 74.313 1.986 1.155 314 188 621 130 252 1.978 188.084 235.355.778 85.904.859 2.722006 - 2007 1.528.152 67,00% 1.023.862 123.480 85.639 2.289 1.331 362 217 716 150 290 2.279 216.752 270.514.491 98.737.789 3.132007 - 2008 1.559.749 68,00% 1.060.629 127.914 88.715 2.371 1.379 375 224 741 155 301 2.361 224.536 280.056.157 102.220.497 3.242008 - 2009 1.592.000 69,00% 1.098.480 132.479 91.881 2.456 1.428 388 232 768 160 311 2.445 232.549 289.881.200 105.806.638 3.362009 - 2010 1.624.917 70,00% 1.137.442 137.178 95.140 2.543 1.479 402 241 795 166 322 2.532 240.797 299.997.731 109.499.172 3.472010 - 2011 1.658.515 71,00% 1.177.546 142.014 98.494 2.632 1.531 416 249 823 172 334 2.621 249.287 310.410.023 113.299.659 3.592011 - 2012 1.692.808 72,00% 1.218.822 146.992 101.947 2.725 1.584 431 258 852 178 345 2.713 258.025 321.124.866 117.210.576 3.722012 - 2013 1.727.810 73,00% 1.261.301 152.115 105.500 2.820 1.639 446 267 882 184 357 2.808 267.018 332.153.590 121.236.060 3.842013 - 2014 1.763.536 74,00% 1.305.017 157.387 109.156 2.917 1.696 462 276 912 191 370 2.905 276.273 343.502.386 125.378.371 3.982014 - 2015 1.800.000 75,00% 1.350.000 162.812 112.919 3.018 1.755 478 286 944 197 383 3.005 285.796 355.182.500 129.641.612 4.112015 - 2016 1.837.218 76,00% 1.396.286 168.395 116.790 3.121 1.815 494 296 976 204 396 3.108 295.595 222.910.232 81.362.235 2.582016 - 2017 1.875.206 77,00% 1.443.909 174.138 120.774 3.228 1.877 511 306 1.009 211 409 3.214 305.677 235.273.709 85.874.904 2.722017 - 2018 1.913.979 78,00% 1.492.904 180.047 124.872 3.337 1.940 528 316 1.044 218 423 3.323 316.049 247.993.249 90.517.536 2.872018 - 2019 1.953.554 79,00% 1.543.308 186.126 129.088 3.450 2.006 546 327 1.079 225 437 3.436 326.719 261.075.151 95.292.430 3.022019 - 2020 1.993.947 80,00% 1.595.158 192.379 133.425 3.566 2.073 564 338 1.115 233 452 3.551 337.696 274.537.116 100.206.047 3.182020 - 2021 2.035.175 81,00% 1.648.492 198.811 137.886 3.685 2.143 583 349 1.152 241 467 3.670 348.987 288.382.206 105.259.505 3.342021 - 2022 2.077.256 82,00% 1.703.350 205.427 142.474 3.808 2.214 603 361 1.191 249 483 3.792 360.600 302.624.175 110.457.824 3.502022 - 2023 2.120.207 83,00% 1.759.772 212.232 147.194 3.934 2.287 622 372 1.230 257 499 3.918 372.545 317.269.127 115.803.231 3.672023 - 2024 2.164.046 84,00% 1.817.799 219.230 152.047 4.064 2.363 643 385 1.271 266 515 4.047 384.829 332.334.163 121.301.970 3.852024 - 2025 2.208.792 85,00% 1.877.473 226.427 157.039 4.197 2.440 664 397 1.313 274 532 4.179 397.462 347.826.070 126.956.515 4.032025 - 2026 2.254.463 86,00% 1.938.838 233.827 162.171 4.334 2.520 686 410 1.356 283 549 4.316 410.453 363.757.084 132.771.336 4.21Note:(4) = (2) x (3)(10) = (4)/density by lot(12) = (11)/1000*365YEAR POPULATIONTOTALCOVER(%)POPULATIONSERVEDC/CONEXION (hab)I NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS OF GREAT VOLUME AVERAGE OF DESAGUEDOMESTIC (5) COMMERCIAL (6) INDUSTRIALIST (7)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO1213,2 Analysis of the supply3.2.1 Residual water treatmentAt the moment in the area of the project the residual waters are evacuated in their totality to the seaand to the Rímac river; a part of Collector 6 is not even derived for the irrigated land of the zone fromSan Agustín, without previous treatment. Therefore, the supply of residual water treatmentshe is null.3,3 Balance Supply Demand of residual water treatmentThe balance took place supplies – demand for all the horizon of the project. From the first oneyear of the horizon of the project the deficit in the residual water treatment is demonstrated, andthis deficit could continue in case does not execute the project. In the No.3.26 picture and graph3.1 is the deficit in all the horizon of the project.In year 2015 a reduction of the volume of residual waters is appraised; this must athat year 2015 they will enter operation a group of decentralized plants thatthey will be located in the high parts Taboada subsystem, which will treat a flow averageof 2,74 residual waters of m3/s, alleviating this way the unloadings in the PTARTaboada.Picture No. 3.26Balance Supplies - Demandof residual water treatment(thousands m3/año) Graphical 3.1Own elaborationBalance Supplies - Demand of Residual Water Treatment01000002000003000004000005000006000001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20YearsVolume (thousands m3/año)Supply of treatment residual watersDemand of residual water treatmentDemand of Treatment ofWater-drainagesSupply deTratamiento ofWater-drainagesYear SuppliesPresentDemandprojectedSupplylessDemand2006 - 2007 0 356.202 -356,2022007 - 2008 0 365.600 -365,6002008 - 2009 0 375.239 -375,2392009 - 2010 0 385.132 -385,1322010 -2011 0 395.276 -395,2762011 - 2012 0 405.684 -405,6842012 - 2013 0 416.355 -416,3552013 - 2014 0 427.319 -427,3192014 - 2015 0 438.564 -438,5642015 - 2016 0 363.691 -363,6912016 - 2017 0 375.529 -375,5292017 - 2018 0 387.688 -387,6882018 - 2019 0 400.172 -400,1722019 - 2020 0 412.989 -412,9892020 - 2021 0 426.149 -426,1492021 - 2022 0 439.660 -439,6602022 - 2023 0 453.531 -453,5312023 - 2024 0 467.781 -467,7812024 - 2025 0 482.420 -482,4202025 - 2026 0 497.458 -497,458PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO1223.3.1 Balance Supply Demand residual water Conduction (Intercepting North)Although the North Interceptor is in execution, designed to year 2028 with a diameterof 2400 mm (final section), to lead an of great volume average of 6,415 m3/s and a maximum volumeschedule of 10,708 m3/s21, in the present study will be made an analysis of the balance supplies –demand of this infrastructure, considering that this interceptor receives the unloadingsoriginating of the drainage areas that are picture 3.27According to the calculations of demand made in the present study, the flows of water-drainagethat they contribute to the North Interceptor they are the following ones:Picture No. 3.27Of great volume average of the North InterceptorArea of Qp Drainage (m3/s)Year 2005Qp (m3/s)Year 2025Costanero 0,88 1.11Navy 1,39 1.61Argentina 0,81 0.98Collector Not 19 0,84 1.13Collector Not 6 0,95 (*) 1.03Bocanegra 0,27 0.55TOTAL 5,13 6.41(*) The total volume of Collector 6 is not of 2,71 m3/s, but a part is derived towards the zonesof culture for irrigated land, entering single the interceptor 35% of this volume (0,95 m3/s)According to information of the Equipment Harvesting and Final Disposition, as of the year the 2015 volumethat the interceptor enters considers in 20% of the volume that has Collector Not 6, becauseit anticipates that the difference will be treated in treatment plants.Picture No. 3.2821 Information provided by Partnership Collectors of the Callao (contractor in charge to execute the work)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO123Picture 3.2åBalance Supplies Demand Water ConductionResidual North Interceptor (thousands of m3/año)Own ElaborationGraph 3.1aAs 3.1a is appraised in the graph, the North Interceptor would have sufficient capacity stopsto recepcionar the water-drainages anticipated until year 2025.YearSupplyPresent(a)DemandprojectedSupplylessDemand2006 - 2007 337.687 277.850 59,8382007 - 2008 337.687 283.014 54,6742008 - 2009 337.687 288.262 49,4262009 - 2010 337.687 293.616 44,0712010 -2011 337.687 299.055 38,6332011 - 2012 337.687 304.598 33,0902012 - 2013 337.687 310.230 27,4582013 - 2014 337.687 315.988 21,6992014 - 2015 337.687 321.847 15,8402015 - 2016 337.687 276.296 61,3912016 - 2017 337.687 280.918 56,7702017 - 2018 337.687 285.620 52,0682018 - 2019 337.687 290.399 47,2892019 - 2020 337.687 295.251 42,4372020 - 2021 337.687 300.186 37,5012021 - 2022 337.687 305.203 32,4852022 - 2023 337.687 310.297 27,3912023 - 2024 337.687 315.488 22,2002024 - 2025 337.687 320.774 16,9132025 - 2026 337.687 326.158 11,530(a) Thousands supply = 10.708x365x24x60x60/1000 = 337.687 m3/año337.687 North Intercepting Supply (Qmh = 10.708 m3/s)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO124Optimal period of designPlant of TreatmentThe period of design of a treatment plant establishes the date in which the capacity ofdesign of the treatment plant completely will be used. This it is the period alongof which the capacity of the plant is sufficient to fulfill the standards of the efluenterequired. The period of diseño22 can be determined by:• The reliability of future projections of residual water flows and loads.• The financial resources available for the construction, operation and maintenance• The interest rates and their fluctuations• Potential for future extensions (plants that allow expansions by phases ofits capacities in intervals of short time (for example 5 – 10 years) are moreeconomic that those with “baja capacidad” or “sobre capacidad”• The life expectancy of the facilities of the plant. The structures and conduitshydraulic engineers require long times of life; the electrical mechanical equipment byless between 5 and 10 years.Considering the mentioned criteria lines above, and the recommendations ofNational direction of Saneamiento (DNS), and considering that in the country we did not count onplants of residual water treatment similar to which considers in the presentstudy, and to the date is not counted on factors of economy of scale for these types ofplants, have been considered:Optimal period of Design = 10 yearsHowever, this concept will have to be reviewed in the following level of study.Considering that the project would be executed in the middle of year 2008 of the horizon ofproject, will be had as year of design, the year 2018, in which a demand will be had of12,69 residual waters of m3/s like of great volume average.We considered that he is preservative to design the plant with a capacity so that has supportedvolumes considered until year 2018, because according to the Optimized Masterful Plan ofSEDAPAL, for year 2015 have predicted the operation of decentralized plants,those that would allow to alleviate the unloadings in Planta Taboada and to preserve the good oneoperation and life utility of the primary collectors; reason why it is anticipated that probablyan immediate extension of the plant is not required. Preliminarily, these plants inset m3/s23 would deal with an of great volume average 2,74.In order to calculate the hour maximum Volume K2 factor will be used = 1,8, with which it is: Q mh= 22,84 m3/sTherefore, the volumes of design of the plant of residual water treatment Taboada andthe submarine emissary will be:Qp = 12,69 m3/sQmh = 22,84 m3/s22 Translation of the book to “Wastewater Treatment – Part 1” International for Institute Infrastructural, Hydraulic andEnvironmental Engineering – The Netherlands. Veenstra, 200123 Source: Equipment Investigation, Normalization and Physical PlanningPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO1253,4 CostsInitially the costs will be expressed in real suns to prices of the 31 of December of2005. In some cases a type of turn to the new sun of S/. 3.30 has been used byeach dollar.3.4.1 Costs of Investment3.4.1.1 Costs of the situation “sin proyecto”Since in the zone of the project residual water treatment does not exist, the costs ofsituation “sin proyecto” they are null.3.4.1.2 Costs of the situation “con proyecto”The costs in the situation “con proyecto”, they will be made up of the investment costsfuture initial and of the actions and activities anticipated for each alternative of the componentsof residual water treatment, including the administrative management.The costs of investment of the project have been considered from the components of each oneof the alternatives. In pictures 3,23 to 3.30a these costs are private pricesand social, as well as the cronograms of investment and the cronograms of physical goals stopboth alternatives.These costs are expressed to prices of market and include unforeseen expenses, expensesgenerals and utilities and IGV.He is possible to indicate that the costs for each one of the components and alternatives, have calculatedfrom the information of previous studies made by International Consultants, and infunction to estimations conducted by the team of professionals that formulates the presentprofile.PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO126Picture no. 3,29 Costs Considered of Inversio'n to Private Precios (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 1: Plant of Primary Residual Water Treatment and Submarine EmissaryNote: Analyzed proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants of Residual Water Treatment and Emitter North Lima, PARSONS ENGINEERINGTo TREATMENT PLANT1, Work in the land Glb 1 1 5.655,28 3.882,51 250,48 751,45 1.640,67 2.003,88 3.995,23 3.131,06 1 5,655.282, Works of head Glb 1 2 8.110,22 3.140 2.293 1.013 3.186 2.402 10.455 5.622 2 8,110.223, Blowers Glb 1 7 47,78 74,92 63,23 20,82 85,64 63,86 289,75 149,56 7 47.784, Clarificadores primarios/control of scents Glb 1 8 3.071,28 9.214,97 6.589,61 3.448,35 9.367,07 7.043,87 30.793,14 16.614,26 8 3,071.285. Provision and storage of chemistries Glb 1 3, 403,13 1.089,00 680,63 544,50 408,38 680,63 3, 403.136, Digestores and anaeróbicos Glb 1 5 2.749,93 10.838,98 3.724,99 4.013,89 5.654,92 4.357,19 13.609,97 10.549,99 5 2,749.937, Generating motors Glb 1 4 2.030,86 3.433,62 3.558,13 1.108,42 4.841,24 3.534,44 17.148,85 8.406,17 4 2,030.868. Emptied of muds Glb 1 2 5.416,35 2.407,63 2.149,98 696,56 2.915,78 2.160,74 10.002,39 5.083,27 2 5,416.359, Tanks of mud storage Glb 1 4 51,49 168,45 21,06 63,17 42,92 42,92 22,68 90,30 4 51.4910, Installation of maintenance Glb 1 3, 576,91 450,66 302,02 106,90 406,38 312,00 1.283,57 715,38 3, 576.9111, Installation of operations Glb 1 1, 180,88 271,25 99,10 45,01 129,82 111,67 287,86 236,18 1, 180.8812, Electricity and instrumentation of Plant Glb 1 6 3.252,75 5.262,63 10.525,26 1.568,67 8.197,56 9.260,20 15.787,89 12.650,55 6 3,252.7513, Diverse facilities Glb 1 1 1.706,75 3.069,00 198,00 594,00 1.296,90 1.049,40 3.158,10 2.341,35 1 1,706.7514, Engineering (work design and supervision) Glb 1 2 8.844,34 5.077 9.692 2.769 5.538 5.769 2 8,844.34SUB-TOTAL A (Thousands of Suns) 4 8.380 3 0.455 2 3.666 4 0.534 3 7.880 1 06.835 72.040 3 60,197.95B. SUBMARINE EMISSARYProvision of pipes Glb 1 385.074,32 24.004,63 140.027,03 12.002,32 32.006,18 20.003,86 80.015,44 77.014,86 385,074.32Installation terrestrial emissary/movilizac. and desmoviliz. Glb 1 170.950,86 17.761,13 62.163,95 3.552,23 17.761,13 8.880,56 26.641,69 34.190,17 170,950.86Installation diffusing marine emissary/Glb 1 272.994,88 17.017,86 85.089,31 5.672,62 22.690,48 17.017,86 70.907,76 54.598,98 272,994.88Engineering (design and supervision) Glb 1 42.610,54 3.984,36 1.328,12 885,41 22.135,34 1.328,12 4.427,07 8.522,11 42,610.54SUB-TOTAL B 62.768 2 88.608 2 2.113 9 4.593 4 7.230 1 81.992 174.326 8 71,631TOTAL COST (Thousands of Suns) 111.148 319.064 45.779 135.127 85.110 288.827 2 46.366 1,231,829TOTAL COST (EMISSARY PLANTS +) IN THOUSANDS OF SUNS: 1,231,829IN THOUSANDS OF DOLARES: 373,281MaterialNationalMaterialMatteredEquipmentMatteredExpensesGenerals andUtility (25%deldirect cost)Hand ofit builds nodescribedManual labordescribedEquipmentNationalDESCRIPTIONCostUnitarian(thousands ofSuns)DESCRIPTIONCostUnitarian(thousands ofSuns)Unit AmountMaterialNationalMaterialMatteredHand ofit builds nodescribedManual labordescribedTOTAL(thousands ofSuns)Unit AmountGeneral Expensesand Utility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL(thousands ofSuns)EquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO127Picture no. 3.29a Costs Considered of Inversio'n to Social Precios (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 1: Plant of Primary Residual Water Treatment and Submarine EmissaryNote: Analyzed proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants of Residual Water Treatment and Emitter North Lima, PARSONS ENGINEERINGCORRECTION FACTORS: 0.8403 0,8602 0,8600 0,9091 0,8403 0,8602 0.8403To TREATMENT PLANT1, Work in the land Glb 1 13.367,31 3.262,47 215,47 646,25 1.491,54 1.683,86 3.436,70 2.631,03 13,367.312, Works of head Glb 1 24.113,83 2.638,43 1.972,23 870,99 2.896,19 2.018,15 8.993,65 4.724,20 24,113.833, Blowers Glb 1 641,69 62,96 54,39 17,90 77,86 53,66 249,24 125,67 641.694, Clarificadores primarios/control of scents Glb 1 71.261,10 7.743,34 5.668,38 2.965,59 8.515,60 5.918,96 26.488,26 13.960,96 71,261.105. Provision and storage of chemistries Glb 1 2.912,01 915,09 585,47 468,27 371,25 571,93 2,912.016, Digestores and anaeróbicos Glb 1 45.138,86 9.107,99 3.204,24 3.451,94 5.140,89 3.661,35 11.707,30 8.865,15 45,138.867, Generating motors Glb 1 36.085,52 2.885,27 3.060,70 953,24 4.401,17 2.969,99 14.751,44 7.063,71 36,085.528. Emptied of muds Glb 1 21.813,52 2.023,13 1.849,41 599,04 2.650,74 1.815,67 8.604,06 4.271,47 21,813.529, Tanks of mud storage Glb 1 384,46 141,55 18,11 54,32 39,02 36,07 19,51 75,88 384.4610, Installation of maintenance Glb 1 3.067,30 378,69 259,79 91,94 369,44 262,17 1.104,13 601,14 3,067.3011, Installation of operations Glb 1 1.009,82 227,93 85,24 38,71 118,02 93,83 247,62 198,46 1,009.8212, Electricity and instrumentation of Plant Glb 1 54.269,81 4.422,19 9.053,83 1.349,05 7.452,40 7.781,35 13.580,74 10.630,26 54,269.8113, Diverse facilities Glb 1 10.004,90 2.578,88 170,32 510,84 1.179,01 881,81 2.716,60 1.967,44 10,004.9014, Cost of engineering (work design and supervision) Glb 1 24.619,33 4.265,87 8.334,86 2.517,35 4.653,68 4.847,58 24,619.33SUB-TOTAL To 40.653,80 26.197,59 20.352,95 37.220,47 31.830,55 91.899,23 60.534,87 308,689.45CORRECTION FACTORS: 0.8403 0,8602 0,8600 0,9091 0,8403 0,8602 0.8403B. SUBMARINE EMISSARYProvision of pipes Glb 1 330.395 20.171 120.451 10.322 29.097 16.809 68.829 64.716 3 30,395Installation terrestrial emissary/movilizac. and desmoviliz. Glb 1 146.709 14.925 53.473 3.055 16.147 7.462 22.917 28.730 1 46,709Installation diffusing marine emissary/Glb 1 234.175 14.300 73.194 4.878 20.628 14.300 60.995 45.880 2 34,175Engineering (design and supervision) Glb 1 37.461 3.348 1.142 761 20.123 1.116 3.808 7.161 3 7,461SUB-TOTAL B 52.744 2 48.261 19.017 85.995 3 9.688 1 56.549 146.486 7 48,740TOTAL COST (Thousands of Suns) 93.398 274.459 39.370 123.215 71.518 248.449 2 07.021 1,057,429TOTAL COST (EMISSARY PLANTS +) IN THOUSANDS OF SUNS: 1,057,429IN THOUSANDS OF DOLARES: 320,433.09DESCRIPTION Unit AmountCostUnitarian(Thousands ofSuns)TOTAL(thousands ofSuns)MaterialNationalMaterialMatteredHand ofit builds nodescribedManual labordescribedExpensesGenerals andUtility (25%deldirect cost)EquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredDESCRIPTION Unit AmountCostUnitarian(Thousands ofSuns)ExpensesGenerals andUtility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL(thousands ofSuns)MaterialNationalMaterialMatteredHand ofit builds nodescribedManual labordescribedEquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO128Picture no. 3.29b Cronogram of Investment to Private Prices (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 1: Plant of Primary Residual Water Treatment and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Analyzed proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants of Residual Water Treatment and Emitter North Lima, PARSONS ENGINEERINGPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO129Picture no. 3.29c Cronogram of Investment to Social Prices (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 1: Plant of Primary Residual Water Treatment and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Analyzed proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants of Residual Water Treatment and Emitter North Lima, PARSONS ENGINEERINGPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO130Picture no. 3.29d Cronogram of Physical GoalsAlternative 1: Plant of Primary Residual Water Treatment and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Analyzed proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants of Residual Water Treatment and Emitter North Lima, PARSONS ENGINEERINGPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO131Picture no. 3,30 Costs Considered of Inversio'n to Private Precios (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 2: Plant of Preliminary Residual Water Treatment Advanced and Submarine EmissaryTo TREATMENT PLANTCIVIL WORKSEarthwork Glb 1 6.894,24 2.148,85 143,26 429,77 214,89 429,77 2.148,85 1.378,85 6,894.24Concrete Structural Glb 1 13.788,48 5.730,28 716,28 2.148,85 859,54 859,54 716,28 2.757,70 13,788.48Auxiliary buildings and Other Glb 1 9.192,32 4.297,71 955,05 573,03 286,51 286,51 955,05 1.838,46 9,192.32EQUIPMENTEquipment Glb 1 141.082,37 11.726,33 14.657,91 4.397,37 5.863,16 2.931,58 73.289,55 28.216,47 141,082.37Electricity and Instrumentation Glb 1 39.067,37 4.058,95 8.117,89 1.217,68 2.435,37 3.247,16 12.176,84 7.813,47 39,067.37Engineering (design and supervision) 19,783.25 Glb 1 19.783,25 1.849,86 616,62 411,08 10.277,01 616,62 2.055,40 3.956,65SUB-TOTAL To 29.811,98 25.207,01 9.177,79 19.936,49 8.371,19 91.341,98 45.961,61 229,808.04B. SUBMARINE EMISSARYProvision of pipes Glb 1 385.074,32 24.004,63 140.027,03 12.002,32 32.006,18 20.003,86 80.015,44 77.014,86 385,074.32Installation terrestrial emissary/movilizac. and desmoviliz. Glb 1 170.950,86 17.761,13 62.163,95 3.552,23 17.761,13 8.880,56 26.641,69 34.190,17 170,950.86Installation diffusing marine emissary/Glb 1 272.994,88 17.017,86 85.089,31 5.672,62 22.690,48 17.017,86 70.907,76 54.598,98 272,994.88Engineering (design and supervision) Glb 1 42.610,54 3.984,36 1.328,12 885,41 22.135,34 1.328,12 4.427,07 8.522,11 42,610.54SUB-TOTAL B 62.767,99 288.608,41 22.112,58 94.593,13 47.230,41 181.991,96 174.326,12 871,630.59TOTAL COST (Thousands of Suns) 92.579,96 313.815,42 31.290,37 114.529,62 55.601,59 273.333,94 220.287,73 1,101,438.63Source: Adapted of the Metropolitan Project of Integral Cleaning for Lima. Canadian Commercial Corporation, 2002Type of change: 1USS = S/. 3,3 TOTAL COST (PLANT + SUBMARINE EMISSARY) IN THOUSANDS OF SUNS: 1,101,439IN THOUSANDS OF DOLARES: 333,769DESCRIPTION UnitDESCRIPTION UnitAmount CostUnitarianMaterialNationalMaterialMatteredManual labornot describedManual labordescribedEquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredGeneral Expensesand Utility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL (INCL.GG+IGV)(USS)General Expensesand Utility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL (INCL.GG+IGV)(USS)Amount CostUnitarianEquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredMaterialNationalMaterialMatteredManual labornot describedManual labordescribedPROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO132Picture no. 3.30a Costs Considered of Inversio'n to Social Precios (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 2: Plant of Preliminary Residual Water Treatment Advanced and Submarine EmissaryCORRECTION FACTORS: 0.8403 0,8602 0,8600 0,9091 0,8403 0,8602 0.8403TREATMENT PLANTCIVIL WORKSEarthwork Glb 1 5.862,09 1.805,68 123,23 369,60 195,35 361,14 1.848,44 1.158,65 5,862.09Concrete Structural Glb 1 11.716,44 4.815,15 616,15 1.848,01 781,41 722,27 616,15 2.317,29 11,716.44Auxiliary buildings and Other Glb 1 7.793,32 3.611,36 821,53 492,80 260,47 240,76 821,53 1.544,86 7,793.32EQUIPMENTEquipment Glb 1 120.791,69 9.853,63 12.608,73 3.781,74 5.330,20 2.463,41 63.043,67 23.710,30 120,791.69Electricity and Instrumentation Glb 1 33.423,72 3.410,73 6.983,01 1.047,21 2.213,99 2.728,59 10.474,52 6.565,66 33,423.72Engineering (design and supervision) Glb 1 17.392,20 1.554,44 530,42 353,53 9.342,83 518,15 1.768,06 3.324,77 17,392.20196,979.45 SUB-TOTAL To 25.051,01 21.683,07 7.892,90 18.124,26 7.034,31 78.572,37 38.621,54CORRECTION FACTORS: 0.8403 0,8602 0,8600 0,9091 0,8403 0,8602 0.8403Provision of pipes Glb 1 330.395,27 20.171,09 120.451,25 10.321,99 29.096,82 16.809,24 68.829,28 64.715,59 330,395.27Installation terrestrial emissary/movilizac. and desmoviliz. Glb 1 146.709,18 14.924,68 53.473,43 3.054,91 16.146,64 7.462,34 22.917,18 28.730,00 146,709.18Installation diffusing marine emissary/Glb 1 234.174,79 14.300,11 73.193,83 4.878,45 20.627,92 14.300,11 60.994,86 45.879,52 234,174.79Engineering (design and supervision) Glb 1 37.460,52 3.348,06 1.142,45 761,46 20.123,24 1.116,02 3.808,16 7.161,13 37,460.52SUB-TOTAL B 52.743,94 248.260,95 19.016,82 85.994,62 39.687,71 156.549,49 146.486,24 748,739.76TOTAL COST (Thousands of Suns) 77.794,94 269.944,02 26.909,72 104.118,88 46.722,02 235.121,85 185.107,78 945,719.21Source: Adapted of the Metropolitan Project of Integral Cleaning for Lima. Canadian Commercial Corporation, 2002Type of change: 1USS = S/. 3,3 TOTAL COST (PLANT + SUBMARINE EMISSARY) IN THOUSANDS OF SUNS: 945,719.21IN THOUSANDS OF DOLARES: 286,582DESCRIPTION UnitExpensesGenerals andUtility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL (INCL.GG+IGV)(USS)Amount CostUnitarianMaterialNationalMaterialMatteredManual labornot describedManual labordescribedEquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredDESCRIPTION Unit Amount CostUnitarianMaterialNationalMaterialMatteredManual labornot describedManual labordescribedEquipmentNationalEquipmentMatteredExpensesGenerals andUtility (25%deldirect cost)TOTAL (INCL.GG+IGV)(USS)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO133Picture no. 3.30b Cronogram of Investment to Private Prices (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 2: Plant of Preliminary Residual Water Treatment Advanced and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Information jointly analyzed with the Proposal Metropolitan Project of Integral Cleaning for Lima, Consulting Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO134Picture no. 3.30c Cronogram of Investment to Social Prices (in thousands of New Suns)Alternative 2: Plant of Preliminary Residual Water Treatment Advanced and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Information jointly analyzed with the Proposal Metropolitan Project of Integral Cleaning for Lima, Consulting Canadian Commercial CORPORATION (CCC)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO135Picture no. 3.30d Cronogram of Physical GoalsAlternative 2: Plant of Preliminary Residual Water Treatment Advanced and Submarine EmissaryOwn elaborationNote: Information jointly analyzed with the Proposal Metropolitan Project of Integral Cleaning for Lima, Consulting Canadian Commercial CORPORATION (CCC)PROFILE: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT OF RESIDUAL WATER TREATMENTTABOADA And SUBMARINE EMISSARY - DISTRICT And PROVINCE Of the CALLAO1363.4.1.3 Increméntales CostsThe increméntales costs come to be the difference of the costs of investment withproject and the costs of investment without project. Considering that in the situation withoutproject is not counted on infrastructure for the residual water treatment,being therefore null the investment costs, costs will be had themincreméntales such come to be that the costs of investment with project.3.4.2 Costs of Operation and MaintenanceIn order to consider the total costs attributable to the operation, maintenance, is hadanalyzed the present costs of the operative activities and maintenance ofresidual waters that SEDAPAL has, according to the information provided bythe Equipment Harvesting and Final Disposition of the company for period 2005.In order to elaborate the structure of residual water cost, it has been analyzed in formseparated the costs of residual water operation and the costs of maintenanceof residual waters, with the purpose of identifying all the operative activities and ofresidual water maintenance and to group them according to the element to whichthey belong, later to analyze them in the corresponding heading.The cost of operation and maintenance of the submarine emissary is the same one foralternatives 1 and 2, since both alternatives have the same emissary. To see PicturesUs. 3.35 and 3.36In the analysis of the costs of operation and maintenance of the project and for effect ofevaluation has reviewed the proposal of the Feasibility study of Plants ofTreatment of Residual Waters and Emitter Files North of PARSONS ENGINEERINGINTERNATIONAL, INC.. and the proposal of the Project Integral Cleaning for LimaMetropolitan, Consulting Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC) jointly withthe costs provided by the Equipment of Final Disposition. To see following Pictures: